Join the Residential Landlords Association

Member Forums - Report Post

If you wish for the RLA to contact you regarding this report please remember to provide contact details.

Please Note: - This facility is for reporting of abuse or other breaches of the forum rules. Please do not use this facility to reply to the post as your response will not appear here - to reply please use the quote option.
  1. Please do not post RLA enquiries in these forums. Any enquiries should be sent to info@rla.org.uk.
  2. Please note that the initial message in any forum conversation on this website is viewable by the public.
  3. For security reasons, please do not include your membership number within the title or body of your forum post.
  4. You must not include any personal details relating to your tenants, such as their names and addresses, in your postings.
  5. You must not use the forums to advertise your service or business. Please use the RLA's suppliers guide for all advertising purposes.
  6. Any content deemed as advertising, inappropriate or does not meet the RLA's code of conduct will be removed from the forums.
  7. The RLA cannot be held responsible for any posts made in these forums by non-RLA staff
Report a post:
Tom39 said: Posted on: 14/10/2016 13:37

Dear Advice Team.

a) We have repeatedly advised the Tenant that we continue to hold her in breach of her tenancy agreement as we do not feel comfortable in tacitly "vindicating" her initial deception.
b) The Tenant recently demanded our co-operation in removing our supplied white goods which were in place at the property when it was first let to her.
c) We have promised measured co-operation if she supplied evidence that she has maintained her pet insurance policy during the several month interim. She previously copied the policy - which is or was monthly renewable - when her deception first came to light. We feel this issue is pertinent as a pet policy demonstrates responsible ownership, mitigates against crisis diversion of rent for unforeseen pet illness, and is recommended for landlords of dog-owning tenants.
d) We also demanded confirmation that she had obtained permission for her dog at the previous rented property, again as a recommended action for landlords
e) The tenant has clearly neither maintained the policy nor previously obtained permission to house the dog as she has now become unresponsive and started to withhold rent.

My queries are:
1) Do we have any chance of getting this Tenant out under Section 8 for breach of tenancy terms wrt the dog, which dog we have never given approval for?
2) Given that her arrears are only one week to date, would we have to issue a separate Section 8 once the arrears reached 8 weeks or could we cover this point in advance under the Section 8 for the dog on some pretext or other?
3) If we issue a Section 8/ dog and Section 21 at the same time, would the Section 8/ dog hearing be delayed by the Courts until the Section 21 hearing as they would both involve the same tenant and tenancy?
4) Overall, what would you advise us to do?

Landlord & Investment Show London Olympia 2019
Ideal Flatmate
99 Homes
John Pye Auctions