Join the Residential Landlords Association

Member Forums - Report Post

If you wish for the RLA to contact you regarding this report please remember to provide contact details.

Please Note: - This facility is for reporting of abuse or other breaches of the forum rules. Please do not use this facility to reply to the post as your response will not appear here - to reply please use the quote option.
  1. Please do not post RLA enquiries in these forums. Any enquiries should be sent to
  2. Please note that the initial message in any forum conversation on this website is viewable by the public.
  3. For security reasons, please do not include your membership number within the title or body of your forum post.
  4. You must not include any personal details relating to your tenants, such as their names and addresses, in your postings.
  5. You must not use the forums to advertise your service or business. Please use the RLA's suppliers guide for all advertising purposes.
  6. Any content deemed as advertising, inappropriate or does not meet the RLA's code of conduct will be removed from the forums.
  7. The RLA cannot be held responsible for any posts made in these forums by non-RLA staff
Report a post:
pip66 said: Posted on: 07/11/2016 17:32

I have number of properties in a Selective Licence Areas. I had four properties in the first tranche of SLs which have been such a roaring success if you calculate that as income for the council! that they have or are being renewed and extended in area!

The long and short of this is that I missed completing my application for one property in a new SL area. At the time the SL was being pursued I became very ill and also had some other issues. I have now paid all the fees and provided all the documentation following receipt of the summons but the council are continuing to prosecute.

I am clear in my mind that my circumstances were somewhat unfortunate at the time and we are pursuing that as a ground of defence. I would also like to invoke a proportionality argument given if I am found guilty I will not be a fit person to rent property, will not be able to insure the properties for rent and thus I will have to evict all the families in my SL properties as I will not employ an agent or rent uninsured. I also think my tenants Article 8 rights have not been considered properly.

My solicitor has also identified the delay of 1 year from the last purported communication to the summons as indicative of no great concern or rush by the council.

Are you aware of any similar defences being successful or do you have any comments on a successful approach given the circumstances above?

Landlord & Investment Show London Olympia 2019
99 Homes
John Pye Auctions