Join the Residential Landlords Association

Member Forums - Report Post

If you wish for the RLA to contact you regarding this report please remember to provide contact details.

Please Note: - This facility is for reporting of abuse or other breaches of the forum rules. Please do not use this facility to reply to the post as your response will not appear here - to reply please use the quote option.
  1. Please do not post RLA enquiries in these forums. Any enquiries should be sent to
  2. Please note that the initial message in any forum conversation on this website is viewable by the public.
  3. For security reasons, please do not include your membership number within the title or body of your forum post.
  4. You must not include any personal details relating to your tenants, such as their names and addresses, in your postings.
  5. Please always remain respectful to forum members and the RLA. All posts must be should be professional and courteous.
  6. You must not use the forums to advertise your service or business. Please use the RLA's suppliers guide for all advertising purposes.
  7. Any content deemed as advertising, spam or self-promotion will be removed from the forums.
  8. Any content deemed as offensive is strictly prohibited and must be reported for removal.
  9. The RLA cannot be held responsible for any posts made in these forums by non-RLA staff
  10. The RLA have the right to edit, delete or close any thread or post as they see necessary, without prior warning.
Report a post:
RLA member_974 said: Posted on: 25/02/2009 00:00

I am contemplating taking my agent to court for loss of rent and legal costs for evicting my tenant - will total approx £9K. However before I run up more legal fees was interested if anyone has any comments to make on where I stand legally with the following scenario.

My Agent ran a credit check at the time of the let and advised the tenant "passed". It transpires there are 2 levels of credit check the agent performs. One for a let only fee and one for a fully managed fee. I took the let only option with the agent so apparently I was only entitled to their basic credit check. One point to note, I was not advised this at the time. However the agent has now advised an administrative error occurred and my tenant was given the full credit check.

I have now seen the file on the tenant and the check states the tenant is "unacceptable".

The agent is denying any negligence because I was only entitled to the basic check - which the tenant would have passed - therefore they did their job.

Surely even if a more in-depth check was done in error, it was the agentís duty to warn me of this position. Any comments would be appreciated.

Landlord & Investment Show London Olympia 2019
99 Homes
John Pye Auctions