Join the Residential Landlords Association

Member Forums - Report Post

If you wish for the RLA to contact you regarding this report please remember to provide contact details.

Please Note: - This facility is for reporting of abuse or other breaches of the forum rules. Please do not use this facility to reply to the post as your response will not appear here - to reply please use the quote option.
  1. Please do not post RLA enquiries in these forums. Any enquiries should be sent to
  2. Please note that the initial message in any forum conversation on this website is viewable by the public.
  3. For security reasons, please do not include your membership number within the title or body of your forum post.
  4. You must not include any personal details relating to your tenants, such as their names and addresses, in your postings.
  5. You must not use the forums to advertise your service or business. Please use the RLA's suppliers guide for all advertising purposes.
  6. Any content deemed as advertising, inappropriate or does not meet the RLA's code of conduct will be removed from the forums.
  7. The RLA cannot be held responsible for any posts made in these forums by non-RLA staff
Report a post:
Cafefuerte said: Posted on: 05/08/2013 10:54

Further to the recent advice you have been giving to re-issue the Prescribed Information when an AST becomes Statutory Periodic, and highlighting the potential penalties if there is a delay in doing this, there are signature boxes on the form but no date box/es.

Isn't it necessary for the Prescribed Information form to be dated ? If not, why not?

If a date isn't necessary, how could a delay in issuance be proved? If it is necessary, I suspect that a good number of people will have missed this out and be unable to prove they have issued the document in good time.

I'd be grateful for your advice and clarification.

Landlord & Investment Show London Olympia 2019
99 Homes
John Pye Auctions