Join the Residential Landlords Association

Member Forums - Report Post

If you wish for the RLA to contact you regarding this report please remember to provide contact details.

Please Note: - This facility is for reporting of abuse or other breaches of the forum rules. Please do not use this facility to reply to the post as your response will not appear here - to reply please use the quote option.
  1. Please do not post RLA enquiries in these forums. Any enquiries should be sent to
  2. Please note that the initial message in any forum conversation on this website is viewable by the public.
  3. For security reasons, please do not include your membership number within the title or body of your forum post.
  4. You must not include any personal details relating to your tenants, such as their names and addresses, in your postings.
  5. You must not use the forums to advertise your service or business. Please use the RLA's suppliers guide for all advertising purposes.
  6. Any content deemed as advertising, inappropriate or does not meet the RLA's code of conduct will be removed from the forums.
  7. The RLA cannot be held responsible for any posts made in these forums by non-RLA staff
Report a post:
Ben 29 said: Posted on: 03/12/2015 17:19

Hi guys

In relation to the new section 21 rules and revenge evictions, A landlord can't evict a tenant on the basis of them reporting maintenance is sure that the landlord must fix.

I was wondering where a landlord would stand in the case of the maintenance issue being too expensive to repair?

For example if a house needed damp proof course or a very expensive repair Job that the landlord can't afford. If it would make more sense to sell the property and use section 21 to regain possession of the property, Would this become a possible revenge eviction? If the landlord can not fix the problem surely it can't be used against him/her


Landlord & Investment Show London Olympia 2019
99 Homes
John Pye Auctions