LHA - Councils illegal practice of not recalculating after rent increase!
The tenant had already been served with a section13 rent increase, and their rent was going up about 5 days after the review.
My tenant was only awarded the amount that their current rent was – and this will not now be looked at for another year!
The reason for this is that HB will never relook at a claim unless;
1. It is the 12 month anniversary of the claim
2. Or if circumstances relevant to the tenant’s entitlement [such as someone moves in or out of the house…]
The mistake that the local authorities / rent officers are making is that they should really award a tenant the full amount they are entitled, but obviously HB will not actually pay more than the tenant is being charged for rent.
Therefore when a rent increase does go into effect, the housing benefit will be allowed to increase up-to the amount that the LHA was at the time of the review.
If this is not done, and they continue only awarding a maximum depending what the actual rent is, then it is now clear that rent is also one of the major circumstances relevant to the tenant’s entitlement – and therefore if the rent changes, it must surely therefore legally also be a reason that they must recalculate?!
Has anyone got any thoughts on this, or advice how I can clarify exactly what the law really is and perhaps appeal - besides to the council, as they won’t listen [and probably not even understand] as excluding the rent increase from both the award and also from being a reason to recalculate is certainly incorrect!
Want to read more?
This is a members only forum, if you want to read more you need to login to your membership, if you are not a member, click here to join.