united utilities - landlords have to pay water charges if tenants dont.
Even when pointed out to the judge, and agreed by the judge, they have a monopoly and we have no choice but to have water from them, he could not make any other decision, and commented that it was a job for the government to change, not a district judge.
Has anyone else suffered similar, and possibly found a loop hole in the law? I would be interested to hear of any similar circumstances, and if the RLA have ever taken up this issue
Want to read more?
This is a members only forum, if you want to read more you need to login to your membership, if you are not a member, click here to join.