Judge rejecting S21 served in fixed term citing Superstrike v Rodrigues

You are here : Member Forums Possession - Section 8 and Section 21 Judge rejecting S21 served in fixed term citing Superstrike v Rodrigues
This topic has been locked as no posts have been made within the last 90 days.
A
AW_401
7 Posts
0 Thanks
Hi, Can anyone help? Have had judge call a hearing to reject a Section 21(1)b that had been served in fixed term with claim for possession served once tenancy had become a periodic. Comments from court are as follows:

"Upon the matter being considered by the Court under the accelerated possession procedure

And Upon it appearing to the Court that when the tenancy changed from a fixed term assured shorthold tenancy to an assured periodic tenancy a new tenancy was created pursuant to the principles set out in "Superstrike - v - Rodrigues" and the Section 21 Notice was served in relation to the fixed term assured shorthold tenancy."

Not too sure what argument to use. Any advice appreciated.
15/10/2015 16:28

Want to read more?

This is a members only forum, if you want to read more you need to login to your membership, if you are not a member, click here to join.

This topic has been locked as no posts have been made within the last 90 days.
Ideal Flatmate
Elfin Kitchens
Landlord Broadband
John Pye Auctions

Share this page